<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Daily Wiggle &#187; films</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/tag/films/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedailywiggle.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Toy Story 3</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2010/movie-review-toy-story-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2010/movie-review-toy-story-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toy story 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailywiggle.com/?p=1599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not often that a sequel surpasses the original movie.
That&#8217;s what I thought about Toy Story 2, in short.
But what about Toy Story 3? Could it live up to the legacy the first 2 films carried with them?

Honestly? I think it does.
Toy Story 3 sees the toys move to a kindergarten, in which they don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not often that a sequel surpasses the original movie.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I thought about Toy Story 2, in short.</p>
<p>But what about Toy Story 3? Could it live up to the legacy the first 2 films carried with them?</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Toy_Story_3movie_wallpaper_pictures_photo_pics_poster150210000218Toy_Story_3_4.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1603" title="Toy_Story_3(movie_wallpaper_pictures_photo_pics_poster)(150210000218)Toy_Story_3_4" src="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Toy_Story_3movie_wallpaper_pictures_photo_pics_poster150210000218Toy_Story_3_4-300x167.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="167" /></a></center></p>
<p>Honestly? I think it does.</p>
<p>Toy Story 3 sees the toys move to a kindergarten, in which they don&#8217;t enjoy their stay. I won&#8217;t say anything more about it, other than their escape plan is literally genius.</p>
<p>There are also a few new additions to the clan, including huggable toy bear, Lotso, and the extremely cutely named &#8216;Mr. Pricklepants&#8217;. (He&#8217;s a hedgehog. It&#8217;s not as weird when you know this fact.)</p>
<p>Of course, this film was packed with hilarity. I always say the best animated films come with jokes that entertain both the children and the adults and this movie definitely does both.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/1827987_height370_width560.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1604" title="1827987_height370_width560" src="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/1827987_height370_width560.jpg" alt="" width="560" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>The animation, as always, was flawless. Only thing I wasn&#8217;t sure about was the fact that it was 3D. To me, nothing was really added visually because of it, and it would have been just as good in good old-fashioned 2D.</p>
<p>The only thing I thought wasn&#8217;t so strong was the storyline.</p>
<p>There are a couple of tear-jerking moments, but in comparison to Toy Story 2, it seems much less fleshy. Like there could have been a few more twists and turns.</p>
<p>However, that&#8217;s just me being critical.</p>
<p>I really did enjoy it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure it surpasses Toy Story 2 &#8211; my favourite &#8211;  but it is definitely worthy of its &#8216;Toy Story&#8217; title.</p>
<h1>Overall Rating: 9 out of 10.</h1>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2010/movie-review-toy-story-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: The Twilight Saga: Eclipse</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2010/movie-review-the-twilight-saga-eclipse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2010/movie-review-the-twilight-saga-eclipse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dakota fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristen stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert pattinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taylor lautner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailywiggle.com/?p=1576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may remember last year when I reviewed The Twilight Saga: New Moon.
Wait, that was last year?! Jesus, that time flew by.
And did they do better than last time?
Well before seeing the movie myself, I read in several places that this movie was supposedly better than the first 2 combined. So, I went into the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may remember last year when I reviewed <a href="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2009/forget-team-edward-im-on-team-dakota/">The Twilight Saga: New Moon</a>.</p>
<p>Wait, that was last year?! Jesus, that time flew by.</p>
<p>And did they do better than last time?</p>
<p>Well before seeing the movie myself, I read in several places that this movie was supposedly better than the first 2 combined. So, I went into the theatre expecting a pretty good movie.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><center><a href="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Eclipse-Movie-Stills-eclipse-movie-11191875-2560-1703.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1593" title="Eclipse-Movie-Stills-eclipse-movie-11191875-2560-1703" src="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Eclipse-Movie-Stills-eclipse-movie-11191875-2560-1703-1024x681.jpg" alt="" width="430" height="286" /></a></p>
<p></center><br />
Boy, I was wrong.</p>
<p>The best thing about this time round was that it was a little humorous. The script was slightly comedic in places, and the funny lines were delivered mainly by Bella&#8217;s Dad, Charlie, and quite surprisingly, Jacob, played by Taylor Lautner.</p>
<p>This was a vast improvement on the last movie, which focused mainly on a depressive, emo Bella Swan, and was quite frankly very boring.</p>
<p>Acting-wise, Dakota Fanning still steals the show. It&#8217;s that piercing stare and baby-like, haunting smile Fanning is able to turn on and off like a light switch when she plays Jane that makes her the most under-used yet most talented actor in the saga.</p>
<p>Otherwise, it&#8217;s hard to find anything good about the film. The plot sorta sucks when it&#8217;s not in book form &#8211; nothing much really happens. I could have probably written a more interesting plotline myself, if I&#8217;m honest.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/eclipse.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1596" title="eclipse" src="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/eclipse-300x195.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="195" /></a></center></p>
<p>Again, it was too long. I often find myself thinking &#8220;I want this to end now&#8221; when watching movies and this was definitely no exception. I got bored. Verrrrry bored.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t watch this again, let alone buy the DVD. I think if I had to watch it the 2nd time round, I&#8217;d be reading the book at the same time instead. And let&#8217;s face it, it&#8217;s long enough for me to finish the bloody book before the film finishes.</p>
<p>So for any of you who believed what the reviews said in that this was the best movie so far, they lied. Just letting you know.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t see it unless you&#8217;re a serious Twi-Hard.</p>
<h1>Overall Rating: 2 out of 10.</h1>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2010/movie-review-the-twilight-saga-eclipse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Look! A Movie Review That&#8217;s All About Steve!</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2010/oh-look-a-movie-review-thats-all-about-steve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2010/oh-look-a-movie-review-thats-all-about-steve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all about steve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bradley cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandra bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailywiggle.com/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when Sandra Bullock was a celebrated actress?
You&#8217;re probably thinking &#8217;she still is!&#8217; Nuh uh. Not after this.
All About Steve is a twisted rom-com about a cruciverbalist (Bullock) who falls in love with a dishy news cameraman. What&#8217;s a cruciverbalist? Someone who writes crossword puzzles. And that&#8217;s not even the most lame part about it.
It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when Sandra Bullock was a celebrated actress?<a href="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/All_About_Steve.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-778" title="Sandra's Boots are Made for Working" src="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/All_About_Steve.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="614" /></a></p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably thinking &#8217;she still is!&#8217; Nuh uh. Not after this.</p>
<p>All About Steve is a twisted rom-com about a cruciverbalist (Bullock) who falls in love with a dishy news cameraman. What&#8217;s a cruciverbalist? Someone who writes crossword puzzles. And that&#8217;s not even the most lame part about it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not Bullock&#8217;s acting that makes this movie bad, per se, it&#8217;s the crappiness of the general storyline, plot and generally everything else that makes it awful.</p>
<p>One thing that is good? The music. The first song we hear is &#8216;Everybody&#8217;s Got Their Something&#8217; by Nikki Costa, which makes me dance every time I hear it.</p>
<p>I suppose there were a couple of (stifled) giggles coming from the audience, but it wasn&#8217;t really a stand-up comedy.</p>
<p>Best performance definitely comes from Sandra, with Bradley Cooper as a nice little piece of eye candy for the ladies. (And the guys, if they like that sort of thing&#8230;)</p>
<p>Worst movie I&#8217;ve seen this year so far.</p>
<p><strong>Overall Rating: <a href="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/StarIcon.gif"></a><img title="StarIcon" src="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/StarIcon.gif" alt="" width="19" height="19" /></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2010/oh-look-a-movie-review-thats-all-about-steve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Up and Above the Rest</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2009/up-and-above-the-rest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2009/up-and-above-the-rest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailywiggle.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disney-Pixar are up, up and away!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-252" title="UP" src="http://www.thedailywiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/UP-217x300.jpg" alt="UP" width="248" height="345" />This week I went back to being a six year old and went to see new Disney animation &#8217;Up&#8217; at the cinema. Unfortunately, I didn&#8217;t see it in 3D, but I really enjoyed the 2D version nonetheless.</p>
<p>Up follows a bitter old man who sets out for Paradise Falls to fulfill his deceased wife&#8217;s wishes. Along the way he is joined by the token fat kid Russell, a strange looking bird that goes by the name of Kevin and talking dog Dug. Sounds pretty crazy, right? It&#8217;s actually much more normal than it sounds.</p>
<p>The plot is quite unrealistic at parts &#8211; did I mention the talking dog? But then again, what Disney movie is realistic? To be honest, the less realistic the film, the better it is. For example, Toy Story is my favourite Disney movie of all time!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not all fun and laughter, however. The very start of the movie offers up some tear-worthy scenes, leaving not a dry eye in the theatre. I&#8217;ve heard that even grown men cried watching it!</p>
<p>The animation was immaculate. The graphics really showcased the artistry in the movie and you could see the time and effort that went into production.</p>
<p>After all these years, it&#8217;s safe to say that Disney are still Up and above the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedailywiggle.com/2009/up-and-above-the-rest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

